PLAYLINK / Free Play Network
Play Policy and Strategy Discussion Forum
We have now reached the conclusion of the first joint PLAYLINK/Free
Play Network discussion forum on play strategies.
Contributions that were posted on the discussion
forum are still available to view, but the forum is now closed
to new additions. If you have further queries, PLAYLINK
can still be contacted on this and other matters. (Contact PLAYLINK
on 0207 720 2452 or by email to info@playlink.org.uk.)
In its two weeks of operation the play strategy discussion forum
attracted around 120 comments and questions, and there were over
5000 hits on the forum. In quantitative (measurable) terms, we are
pleased with the interest the discussion forum stimulated. We would
welcome your comments (they will not be posted) on how useful -
or otherwise - you found the forum, and any suggestions you might
care to make. Comments and suggestions can be sent by email to info@playlink.org.uk.
The Free Play Network and PLAYLINK are indebted to:
- Alyson Christy, National Development Manager PIP, Kids - National
Development Division
- Mark Gladwin, Play Services Officer, Bradford Early Years and
Childcare Service
- Sean Holehouse, Play Services Manager, Southampton City Council
for sharing their knowledge and experience freely. For reasons
that could not be anticipated, two of the five facilitators were
not able to participate. We hope to be able to involve them on a
future occasion.
We are proposing to run a number of other on-line discussion forums,
starting in September. Our initial list of topics include:
- Risk and Play
- Places for play
- Child protection
- Consultation/participation.
I will not attempt to summarise the points made in the discussion
forum. The forum pages will remain accessible at www.freeplaynetwork.org.uk/playlink/playstrategydiscussion/index2.php,
but as noted above, will be closed for further comment. But it is
impossible to resist the temptation to make some brief points from
PLAYLINK's perspective:
1. Do not be dazzled by the Big Lottery play fund, but use the
opportunity to raise the profile of play to best advantage. A play
strategy should always be wider than your lottery funding aspirations.
2. Consultants' brief: don't devise them yourself in the first
instance, ask the consultant(s) how they would approach the task
and their rationale for approaching the task in the way they propose.
This is more likely to give an insight into their thinking and experience.
3. Audit and consultation: as remarked in the forum comments, two
knotty areas. Our view is that these should not form part of the
initial brief, but provision can be made by the client for future
expenditure under these headings. The reasons are, briefly:
- consultation is to be understood as a problem to be discussed,
not a 'given' that merely requires the application of a method.
In addition, authorities and organisations hold significant amount
of consultation information - the task is often to organise, collate
and consider gaps, rather than spending time and money on elaborate
consultation exercises. There is in any case something odd about
the notion of consulting youngsters on the strategy as a whole
- is it proposed that those youngsters not living in a priority
area should be invited to confirm the judgment? This underscores
the point that consultation needs first to be discussed in terms
of scope, approach and purpose. There is an ethical dimension
here that cannot be avoided.
- Audit: similar reasoning applies here. What is to be included
in an audit is not, or should not be, a 'given', but a problem
to be solved. How audit information is collected requires discussion
the outcome of which cannot be prejudged.
4. Our experience has been that developing policy through to strategy
with objectives and action plan takes no more than ten days of external
consultants' time. Questions about 'consultation' and 'audit' emerge
quite quickly in the course of discussions and inform how these
areas are to be approached. In practice, there will be local variation.
5. Guidance: our general view is that 'guidance' is, or should
be, simply that: a guide not a route map. In other words, taking
account of guidance should not be confused with following a rule.
It is, in our view, vital that local knowledge and judgment are
not marginalized, that councils' and voluntary sector organisations
do not disempower themselves by forgetting what they already know,
including how to read and respond to local circumstance.
Bernard Spiegal
PLAYLINK
3 July 2006
|
Facilitators
To receive notification of future PLAYLINK and Free Play Network
events:
|