Free Play Network News
Issue No. 3, November 2003
Contents
- Every Child Matters, time for your input
- Making space for play in the countryside, Chris
Snell visits the Spinney in Lincolnshire
- Fire Works, what can you do if the fire department
is a dampener?
- Play in Parliament, MPs hold their first debate
on Play
- National Play Strategy, the latest developments
- Discovering Discover, the new play centre in Stratford
- PLAYLINK/Portsmouth Conference, 4 March 2004
- Same Difference? playwork and early years
- Kidsactive bulletin on inclusive play, how inclusive
are you?
- Your views, readers respond to the last edition
of Free Play Network news
- Telegraph Poll, adventure playgrounds with fixed
equipment, does it work?
Free Play Network News is edited by Nicola Butler, Free
Play Network Manager. We welcome contributions and comments from
readers, so if you would like to suggest issues to cover or have
comments on the articles included please let us know by emailing
nbutler at equality.uk.com.
Every Child Matters
By Sandra Melville, PLAYLINK Director
PLAYLINK's draft response to the
Government Green Paper, Every Child Matters, has been posted
to our website to prompt your own response. The deadline for responding
to the consultation on the green paper is 1 December.
It is helpful that the Government's position has moved away from
a narrow interpretation of protection for children at risk to a
more holistic approach to universal services for children. So while
the green paper isn't about play, it does make proposals which should
include play and playworkers. However, it doesn't include these
points at the moment.
The green paper and consultation documents are downloadable from
the DfES website at http://www.dfes.gov.uk/everychildmatters.
It is extremely important that we take up take this opportunity
to make the case for play. Professionals who will be responding
from other sectors such as education, health and social welfare
are highly unlikely to do so, although some will be supportive of
points made by the play sector.
PLAYLINK believes that including play in the Government's plans
will promote the Government's aims for children and we have made
suggestions about how this could work. Feel free to use the draft
in whatever way helps you. It is not necessary to respond to every
question - Q29 asks for 'further comments' and could be used to
state the simple case for play to be included. What is needed is
a massive write in from those concerned with children and play.
Please also feel free to comment to us on what PLAYLINK is proposing
to say. We are keen to put the strongest possible argument but also
to be practical.
Making space for play in the countryside
By Chris Snell, Free Play Network Officer
Space to play in rural villages is often very difficult to find.
Contrary to the Arcadian view of country childhoods past, today's
fields are places of industrial production and children are often
as welcome and as safe there as in a factory. Parish councils and
village playing fields associations often struggle to provide what
little they can.

A group of villages around Little Bytham in Southern Lincolnshire
have developed their own solution. Funded initially by a Millennium
Commission grant they have bought and transformed a six acre piece
of woodland into an environmental play area. The Spinney is a project
in progress; local volunteers are responsible for all the maintenance
of the site and have cleared some of the scrub to open it up. It
now has a car park and picnic area and a wheelchair negotiable track
through the wood.
"We have many more plans for the site," says Patrick Candler, chair
of the local primary school board of governors, which administers
the project. "We are going to put some play equipment into the wood,
like stepping logs and a contour slide, but we want to scatter it
about and not create a single play area. That way we will encourage
children to explore the wood and interact more with the natural
environment. We are also using play equipment in natural materials
that will enhance the feel of the place."
"The wood is teeming with wildlife; we have badgers, squirrels
and quite a few deer. We were concerned that building the track
might scare off the deer, but there is some evidence now of them
running around it like a racetrack."
The School is already using the wood as an outdoor classroom and
there is a natural amphitheatre that could develop into a performance
space some time in the future.
The Spinney aims to serve the six villages that comprise the catchment
of the primary school, none of which have any other play area. Because
of its location, some distance outside the village along a main
road, the Spinney is difficult for children to access on their own.
Most children come after school or at weekend with their family,
a compromise situation Patrick admits, but one which provides a
much needed play opportunity for those that at present have none.
The Free Play Network would like to hear from other play providers
with experience of developing play opportunities in a rural setting.
What can be done to improve children's access to quality play opportunities
in rural areas? If you have knowledge or experience of interesting
play projects in the countryside, please let us know by emailing the
Free Play Network at info@playlink.org.uk.
Fire Works
Colleagues from Hull, having recently attended a workshop by Mike
Wragg on fire sculptures, wanted to involve the local fire service
in a fire sculpture project. The fire officers involved were, shall
we say, less than enthusiastic. The fire service spends a lot of
effort discouraging children from playing with fire and this project
was doing just the opposite.
We know of course that allowing children to play with fire in a
controlled way encourages responsible use of fire and reduces the
likelihood of clandestine fires getting out of control. The Free
Play Network would be interested in anyone who has had a more positive
response from their Fire Service, or has practical examples of using
fire with children.
Play in Parliament
By Nicola Butler, Free Play Network Manager
The first parliamentary debate dedicated to the subject of Children's
Play took place in Westminster Hall on 4 November. Introducing the
adjournment debate*, Paddy Tipping MP (Labour, Sherwood), said that
he hoped it would "raise the profile of play and contribute towards
a national strategy for children's play".
Tipping said that although he generally welcomed the Green Paper,
Every Child Matters, it referred "only in passing to children's
play" and that he hoped the debate would contribute to "a firmer
children's Green Paper and a set of policies that recognise children's
play." He identified the problems faced by voluntary groups looking
for funding and called for funding for children's play to be included
in mainstream funding, not just lottery money. Tipping said he wanted
to "continue to work with people within and without Parliament to
build on important progress - the Dobson report, SkillsActive and
the Green paper - to create a framework for children's play."
Hilton Dawson MP (Labour, Lancaster and Wyre) described how play
opportunities for children in the area in which he grew up had diminished
during the past 25 years. Dawson said that a wider range of resources
needed to be available to young people, including space to meet
and to "do their own thing." He called for play to be given the
"prominence that it deserves and requires."
Liberal Democrat Education spokesperson Dr Jenny Tonge MP questioned
whether a strategy for play might lead to setting "targets for play".
She said this would be the "very opposite of what play means...
Play means doing something that you like doing - or doing nothing".
Tonge said that successive governments had "not actually thought
out the consequences of particular policies", highlighting the prescriptive
nature of the national curriculum and standard assessment tests
for seven-year-olds. She said that people "must remember that children
have to learn by taking little risks... They need to know that there
are safe and unsafe things to do."
Malcolm Moss MP (Conservative Shadow Minister for Home, Constitutional
and Legal Affairs) argued that there are currently problems with
"the notion and practice of play" in this country as "playgrounds...
are in decline, often because councils no longer wish to maintain
them because of the pressures on their revenue account, or perhaps
because they no longer want to face up to the increasing claims
for injury as our society becomes more litigious."
On the question of risk and play, Moss said that "if we attempt
to keep children in an ultra-safe environment, we run the risk of
losing a key element of constructive play - a sense of adventure."
Moss called for any play strategy to be "inclusive and to cross
Departments", to be led by a specific department, and "to be more
co-ordinated, both nationally and locally."
Responding for the Government, Minister for the Arts Estelle Morris
MP welcomed the cross party consensus on the importance of play
and described the contribution that the Government has made through
many funding streams, to play initiatives. However, she accepted
that, "There must be more resources. Despite all the money that
has been put in, nobody can say that play is now adequately funded."
She offered to comment before Christmas (when the Government responds
to the Dobson report on Lottery Funding for Children's Play) on
the fact that "funding streams come from so many different Government
Departments" and what can be done to achieve a "cohesive provision
of play at ground-floor level, while still getting those funding
pots."
Morris also expressed reservations about a national play strategy,
saying that "because of the way that Governments do things, it could
end up being prescriptive and full of targets."
Contact your MP
You can help keep play on the parliamentary agenda by writing to
your Member of Parliament. Ask your MP to raise the following issues
with the relevant Ministers:
- It's good for children to simply do their own thing.
Many children and young people are crying out for more interesting
opportunities to play. Play helps keep children healthy and happy.
- Play needs to be maintained as a mainstream activity locally
and nationally. As funding for new projects becomes available,
existing play provision needs to be maintained.
- Children play in all sorts of places, so Government needs
to work across Departments.
- People who work with children should be competent and qualified.
- Play should be a much higher priority for local authorities.
- Good play provision includes all children and young people.
You can find out the name of your local MP on the Parliament website
at http://www.parliament.uk and write to them c/o House of Commons,
London, SW1A 0AA or you can send your MP a fax by going to http://www.faxyourmp.com.
* Full text of the debate is available at
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/
cmhansrd/cm031104/halltext/31104h03.htm. An adjournment debate
is a short, non-decision making debate, initiated by backbench Members
of Parliament.
National Play Strategy
By Sandra Melville, PLAYLINK Director
The Children's Play Policy Forum (CPPF) met recently in a seminar,
with invited guests representing a range of interests in play, to
consider what a play strategy for England might look like.
The Government's response to the Dobson Report following
the Play Review (on Lottery Funding for Children's Play, see http://www.freeplaynetwork.org.uk/policy/
for further details) is now expected before Christmas and it is
hoped their response to the Making the Case for Play report
by the Children's Play Council will be published at about the same
time. The Minister responsible, Estelle Morris (Minister for the
Arts), has indicated that she is sympathetic to the idea of a national
strategy, provided it is not rigid.
It will be necessary to move quickly both to respond to this opening
from the Minister and to exploit the opportunities in the next spending
review and in the party manifestos being prepared for the next general
election.
Those at the seminar were clear that a strategy must be explicitly
founded on the values and principles that have been developed by
the sector and must set out a broad vision for all children but
that it would also need to contain very specific deliverables and
be costed. The next stage for CPPF is, in the coming month or two,
to turn the seminar discussion into a draft for consultation with
the sector.
Discovering Discover
Chris Snell visits the Discover play centre in Stratford.

Entry to Discover seems to be a part of the experience. Fronting
an uninviting building on the High Street of Stratford East London,
there is a sign saying 'entrance round the back'. Slightly daunted
I walked around the block expecting a dingy bin-filled alley. Instead
the hoardings along the path were covered with children, artwork
and the path led to a garden filled with play equipment, the sense
of wonder somewhat offset by a high security fence.
Discover is a pay on entry centre aimed primarily at the under
sevens. The publicity for the centre emphasises the centre's story-building
trail, which sounded a little too national curriculum for me, but
the reality was much more open with a series of well designed indoor
spaces and activities. I particularly liked the press button songs
in different languages sung and translated by children and the musical
bridge across an imaginary river. There were also a lot of interesting
places that were just fun spaces to be in and allowed children to
be creative.
The whole indoor space had the feel of a rather nice playgroup
setting, complete with puppet corner and dressing up box, although
with a certain feel that it was really aimed at group visits rather
than families.
The outdoor space is open to local children at no cost and also
had a welcoming feel to it with imaginative planting and some very
creatively designed play structures. In a relatively small area
children are offered a wide range of play opportunities and they
have made imaginative use of sightlines and level changes which
can transform a space as you move into it. The structures themselves
were designed collaboratively with local children and a designer.
In fact the project claims to have consulted around 20,000 children
in the overall design process. This may be the reason that the structures
are very literal. The children wanted a monster with a slide down
its tongue, so that is what they have built - commendable on the
consultation process but to have long lasting appeal equipment ought
to be able to be interpreted in other ways by the children.
Overall a great place to visit if you are under seven. The playworker
in me would prefer a little more 'edge' in the experience. There
was little opportunity for risk taking in either the indoor or outdoor
experiences, but in general good quality design creating a play
friendly space.
For more information see http://ww.discover.org.uk.
PLAYLINK/Portsmouth Conference, 4 March 2004
By Sandra Melville, PLAYLINK Director
The Government's aim of siting a mix of services on school premises
and turning them into a community resource (see Every Child Matters)
makes it all the more important that schools should be attractive
places for children and their families to visit.
The challenge is for them to become centres not only for learning
in the formal, educative sense but for play and recreation, providing
a wealth of opportunities for enjoyment and personal development
for local children and adults.
The 2004 national PLAYLINK/Portsmouth
conference will challenge received ideas of what constitutes
a good environment for learning and explore the common elements
of play and learning environments. We will be following the successful,
case study-based approach of the Designs on Play conference and
work is in progress to identify suitable examples.
Same Difference?
By Chris Snell, Free Play Network Officer
"There is more difference between good and bad practice in both
professions than there is between the professions."
This was the conclusion at the Yorkshire and Humberside Skillsactive
meeting to discuss the development of joint NVQ units between Playwork
and Early Years professional groups. Ever on the defensive against
the perceived encroachment of "early years" values and professionals
into the area of playwork, many of the playwork professionals were
visibly taken aback when, during the discussion of the values and
assumptions that underpin our work, the early years workers agreed
with the playwork assumptions and values.
They felt the current emphasis on curricular learning goals was
misguided and that both early years work and playwork should be
about enabling the child to play. The role of the early years worker
should not be about directing children's play but, if need be, monitoring
and recording self directed play. It was argued that current best
practice in early years work already included this way of working
and that the playworkers' perceptions of guided and directed play
in an early years setting were examples of misguided interpretation
of the underlying values.
Given this level of consensus we look forward to developing a joint
approach to NVQs in playwork and early years. It will be interesting
to see if this consensus has been repeated at other regional meetings
across the country.
Kidsactive email bulletin on inclusive play
Kidsactive (now a division of the charity KIDS) offers an email
bulletin for anyone interested in inclusive play. The bulletin is
bi-monthly and will keep you up to date with policy developments,
news, and information on inclusive play - as well as the wider issues
of play, childcare and disability.
To receive the bulletin you will need to sign up to Kidsactive's
'National Inclusive Play Network'. The NIP Network was launched
in early 2003, and is being funded through the 'Playwork Inclusion
Project' (PIP) contract with the Sure Start Unit (DfES). The
aim of the Network is to assist play and childcare providers in
working towards the greater inclusion of disabled children through
regular e-bulletins, free regional seminars and the sharing of information
and good practice. To sign up to the Network send your email
details to: pip@kidsactive.org.uk.
Your Views
The article on Cambridge City Council's decision to close an adventure
playground and a number of traditional playschemes and replace them
with a more flexible, mobile service provoked a number of responses.
Here are some excerpts.
From Dave Wainwright, Islington Council
"The closure of the Adventure Playground [in Cambridge] was
a big deal at the time... it would be helpful to know the answer
to a few other questions... Are there any down sides to the changes?
Has anything been lost in the transformation, and if so what? Is
the new service providing for the same kind of kids as before?
"I haven't visited Cambridge so I don't know what was lost
and whether the gains were worth it... we need an independent view
from someone who is going to bring play values to their analysis."
From Donne James Buck, Children's Play & Safety
"I was disturbed and disappointed to read the report of new
developments in play in Cambridge...I was involved in some of the
early developments of adventure playgrounds in London, Stevenage,
Cambridge and Peterborough in the 60s and 70s... [R]eading that
the Cambridge playground had been closed as part of city play policy
was upsetting.
"I don't believe that the play needs of Cambridge children
are much different from those communities which have adventure playgrounds,
So I wonder where they engage in such activities as building dens,
lighting fires, art and craft work and all the myriad of free-play
activities indoors and out which properly supervised play facilities
enable, not to mention the extensive community development which
goes along with voluntary managed playgrounds. I realize that the
New Ark [where Donne has been involved for many years] is unusual
in the wide variety of facilities on offer, but even the most basic
adventure playgrounds have much more to offer than play staff operating
in parks, most of which were never intended for this purpose. It
seems to me that the Cambridge scheme is designed to serve the needs
of the local authority rather than those of the children."
Telegraph Poll
The Free Play Network are looking into the issue of siting manufactured
fixed equipment in adventure playgrounds. Is it a cost effective
way of augmenting the provision, a safe alternative to self build,
or a perilous slide from the flexibility and creativity of a playground's
own design and build structures?
We hope to investigate further for the next issue of the newsletter
and would like anyone to send us examples of adventure playgrounds
that incorporate manufactured equipment good or bad, with a view
to picking a few to visit. We will as always be happy to air your
views on the subject.
If you have a comment on any of the issues raised in Free Play
Network News, please contact the Free Play Network at nbutler at
equality.uk.com.
|